James Residence - LEED certified
|
Editorial Rating:
Average Rating:
|
John, I am really interested to hear how your LEED experience goes. I think if it is a reasonably simple process and at the end of the day the certification does a pretty good job of measuring actual environmental impact (or lack thereof), then this will be a winning process in terms of getting homebuyers and homebuilders to figure out how to make environmental design the new status quo.
I have the feeling that energy costs might create a lot of unintended LEED compatible houses. With higher energy costs, more attention will be paid to design, SEER, effective R-values, thermal efficiency of windows, etc. and higher transportation costs will force more materials to be sourced locally. If we could get water rates to triple, the same would happen with water conservation. But until that time, we have these types of certifications to help sort through this.
I am interesed in your thoughts on two issues. First, how much of the LEED incentives are what I would call silly in that they might give you points for bamboo flooring imported from China, but nothing for locally made oak flooring. Do you see many perverse incentives in the LEED methodology. Second, does LEED account for some measure of SF per unit of functionality (I just made up that term). Here is what I am getting at: A 1200 SF non-LEED glass box may use far less energy than a 6000 SF LEED certified mansion. If each house shelters 2 people, we want to encourage the glass box over the mansion. Again, how does LEED handle this perverse incentive issue?
Great topic, let's see what comes of it.





front page