Personal tools
log in | join | help
Sections

this sucks (a wee story of central vacs)

by LiveModern Webmaster last modified May 01, 2012 01:04 AM
Editorial Rating: 1 2 3 4 5
Average Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 ( 0 votes)
by bubba of the bubbles (noreply@blogger.com) last modified Apr 30, 2012



 

 

We are planning to put a central vacuum cleaner in our house. Why? In part convenience, in part indoor air quality (they tend to vent outdoors), and in part because the Canadians often have them. If they're good enough for Canadians, they're good enough for Texans.

HowStuffWorks also notes that central vacuum suck more because they are three to five times more powerful. That's cool! Central vacs are also locally quieter (the motor is elsewheres). Fine Homebuilding reports that a central vac can reduce allegory symptoms by 60 percent. Not bad... And they can reduce overall dust levels because of the external exhaust. Most canisters only have to be emptied out twice a year. Folks on the inter webs seem to recommend cyclonic systems (think Dyson).

On the negative side, they cost more than regular vacs. Also, running a central vac that exhausts to the outdoors can depressurize a home, especially if it's running the same time the dryer and/or range vent is running.

Consumer Reports rated central vacs back in 2004:

(Although it's hard to ignore, please ignore the green box.)

Essentially they're all about the same.

The folks at centralvacuumstores.com seem to have quite a bit of good information about central vacuums including comparison data for different sized houses, including "smallish" houses less than 4,000 square feet. If we want cyclonic action, there's only one choice for houses less than 4,000 square feet: the Vacuflo 260:



 

 

 
 
 

Website migration, maintenance and customization provided by Grafware.